From alcoholism to miscarriage, Netflix’s hit animation has tackled the toughest of subjects with a side of animal magic. As it ends, it remains both wise and poignant
If you had to be part horse, which would you prefer: human head and horse’s body, or vice versa? If you had a horse’s body, you could leap over fences naked without flouting social convention, but it would be hard to swipe right on Tinder. Equally, if you had a horse’s head, how would any humans you hoped to seduce understand you? Neighing, in my experience, rarely gets one past first base. Wittgenstein wrote: “If a lion could speak, we could not understand him.” The same goes for horses.
This matter has been on my mind for years, ever since I reviewed the premiere of BoJack Horseman (Netflix), the cartoon about a talking horse actor and other anthropomorphised animals coexisting with humans in Hollywood. How could it have anything more to say than one hoof stamp yes, two no? And yet it has amassed awards and outlived Channel 4 Racing, so it clearly has something.
Continue reading...from Culture | The Guardian https://ift.tt/2GHpGNL
Comments
Post a Comment