Skip to main content

Turner prize 2018; Space Shifters review – from the momentous to the miraculous

Naeem Mohaiemen mesmerises with a man in limbo while Forensic Architecture speaks truth to power in a terrific year for the Turner prize. Elsewhere, 20 artists conjure beauty at its most illusory

By turns shattering, absorbing, beguiling, highly political, frequently momentous: this is the best Turner prize show in years. All the shortlisted works are moving images, in both senses; some filmed on stately 35mm stock, others using cameras attached to kites, or simply shot on smartphones. The uniformity of medium – no painting, sculpture, installation or anything else – is a reflection of the decisions of the four-person jury alone, as always, not a portrait of the contemporary art scene. But it would be hard to avoid the obvious intersection between these works and the maelstrom of modern times: they are like dark reflecting mirrors.

Naeem Mohaiemen, London-born to Bengali parents, is showing two enthralling films, geopolitical romances in a tragic vein. One is a complex musing on the failure of socialism in developing countries, focusing on the long march of radical leaders through the UN – from Indira Gandhi to Arafat and Bhutto – collaging old and new footage to eerie effect. The pensive Indian historian Vijay Prashad draws the past into the present, most dramatically in a scene where he wanders among the vast receding avenues of archive drawers, now empty, where the history of countries and conflicts used to be filed. One could chance upon knowledge quite spontaneously, like life itself; now everything is determined by computer.

Continue reading...

from Culture | The Guardian https://ift.tt/2zFytNu
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Knives Out review – Daniel Craig goes Columbo in Cluedo whodunnit

Craig grills an all-star lineup of suspects when a wealthy novelist is found dead in Rian Johnson’s sharp, country-house murder mystery R ian Johnson unsheathes an entertainingly nasty, if insubstantial detective mystery with his new film, Knives Out. Back in 2005, his debut movie Brick (a high-school thriller) paid tribute to the hardboiled noir genre. Now he does the same thing for cosy crime, although there is nothing that cosy about it. Knives Out has a country house full of frowning suspects, deadpan servants and smirking ne’er-do-wells and an amusing performance from Daniel Craig as Benoît Blanc, the brilliant amateur sleuth from Louisiana who annoys the hell out of one and all by smiling enigmatically, occasionally plinking a jarring high note on the piano during the drawing-room interrogation and pronouncing in his southern burr: “Ah suh-spect far-wuhl play!” Continue reading... from Culture | The Guardian https://ift.tt/2L0NKO4
Post a Comment
Read more

Tracey Emin decorates Regent's Park and a celebration of Islamic creativity – the week in art

Emin and others survey the state of sculpture, Glenn Brown takes his decadent imagination to Newcastle and artists offer northern exposure – all in your weekly dispatch Frieze Sculpture Park Tracey Emin, Barry Flanagan and John Baldessari are among the artists decorating Regent’s Park with a free survey of the state of sculpture. • Regent’s Park, London , 4 July until 7 October. Continue reading... from Culture | The Guardian https://ift.tt/2IDCpPV
Post a Comment
Read more

Elena Ferrante: ‘Solaris is not Tarkovsky’s best film, but it made the greatest impression on me’

Solaris is astonishing because the book that inspired it doesn’t seem to contain Tarkovsky’s film A film that I watch at least once a year is Andrei Tarkovsky’s Solaris . I’ve loved all of Tarkovsky’s works, even the most difficult. Some I’ve seen in the cinema, others on television. I saw Andrei Rublev at the cinema, and on the big screen it was astonishing, its black-and-white extraordinary: I’ll probably never see it again in a cinema, but I hope that young people will have the opportunity. I also saw Solaris on the big screen – not Tarkovsky’s best film, but the one that made the greatest impression on me. I remember that it was advertised as the Soviet answer to 2001: A Space Odyssey – a completely misleading slogan. To see in it a cinematic contest between the US and the USSR was as silly as it was misleading. Kubrick’s marvellous film, with its imaginative force, would certainly win. But it doesn’t have even a hint of the desperation, of the sense of loss, that dominates Sol...
Post a Comment
Read more